| 000 | 01919 a2200313 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1317061039 | ||
| 005 | 20250317111635.0 | ||
| 008 | 250312042018GB eng | ||
| 020 | _a9781317061038 | ||
| 037 |
_bTaylor & Francis _cGBP 46.99 _fBB |
||
| 040 | _a01 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 072 | 7 |
_aQRM _2thema |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aJHB _2thema |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aQRA _2thema |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aHRC _2bic |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aJHB _2bic |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aHRA _2bic |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aREL052000 _2bisac |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aSOC026000 _2bisac |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aREL000000 _2bisac |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_a232.3 _2bisac |
|
| 100 | 1 | _aDavid Martin | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aRuin and Restoration _bOn Violence, Liturgy and Reconciliation |
| 250 | _a1 | ||
| 260 |
_aOxford _bRoutledge _c20181024 |
||
| 300 | _a152 p | ||
| 520 | _bTo suppose that God has a providential plan based on a special covenant with Israel and realised in the atonement presents us with a moral problem. In Ruin and Restoration David Martin sketches a radical naturalistic account of the atonement based on the innocent paying for the sins of the guilty through ordinary social processes. An exercise in socio-theology, the book reflects on the contrast between ’the world’ governed by the dynamic of violence as analysed by the social sciences, including international relations, and the emergence in Christianity (and Buddhism) of a non-violent alternative. A ’governing essay’ fuses frameworks drawn from Reinhold Niebuhr, Karl Jaspers, Ernst Troeltsch and Max Weber and explores the relation between the cultural sciences, especially sociology, and theology treated as another but very distinctive cultural science. Six commentaries then deal with the atonement in detail; with the nature of Christian language and grammar, and with its characteristic mutations due to necessary compromises with ’the world’; with sex and violence; and with the liturgy as a concentrated mode of reconciliation. | ||
| 999 |
_c7048 _d7048 |
||