000			02054 a2200433 4500
001			131711020X
005			20250317111617.0
008			250312042016GB eng
020			_a9781317110200
037			_bTaylor & Francis _cGBP 51.99 _fBB
040			_a01
041			_aeng
072	7		_aLNT _2thema
072	7		_aQRA _2thema
072	7		_aJHB _2thema
072	7		_aLAM _2thema
072	7		_aJBSR _2thema
072	7		_aQRP _2thema
072	7		_aGTM _2thema
072	7		_a1FB _2bisac
072	7		_a5PGJ _2bisac
072	7		_aLNT _2bic
072	7		_aHRA _2bic
072	7		_aJHB _2bic
072	7		_aLAM _2bic
072	7		_aJFSR1 _2bic
072	7		_aHRH _2bic
072	7		_aGTB _2bic
072	7		_a1FB _2bisac
072	7		_aLAW075000 _2bisac
072	7		_aLAW000000 _2bisac
072	7		_a347.014 _2bisac
100	1		_aJanos Jany
245	1	0	_aJudging in the Islamic, Jewish and Zoroastrian Legal Traditions _bA Comparison of Theory and Practice
250			_a1
260			_aOxford _bRoutledge _c20160506
300			_a242 p
520			_bThis book presents a comparative analysis of the judiciary in the Islamic, Jewish and Zoroastrian legal systems. It compares postulations of legal theory to legal practice in order to show that social practice can diverge significantly from religious and legal principles. It thus provides a greater understanding of the real functions of religion in these legal systems, regardless of the dogmatic positions of the religions themselves. The judiciary is the focus of the study as it is the judge who is obliged to administer to legal texts while having to consider social realities being sometimes at variance with religious ethics and legal rules deriving from them. This book fills a gap in the literature examining Islamic, Jewish and Zoroastrian law and as such will open new possibilities for further studies in the field of comparative law. It will be a valuable resource for those working in the areas of comparative law, law and religion, law and society, and legal anthropology.
999			_c5533 _d5533