000			02201 a2200373 4500
001			1138849057
005			20250317100407.0
008			250312042014GB eng
020			_a9781138849051
037			_bTaylor & Francis _cGBP 39.99 _fBB
040			_a01
041			_aeng
072	7		_aJPS _2thema
072	7		_aGTM _2thema
072	7		_aNHK _2thema
072	7		_a1KB _2bisac
072	7		_a1KLCM _2bisac
072	7		_aJPS _2bic
072	7		_aGTB _2bic
072	7		_aHBJK _2bic
072	7		_a1KB _2bisac
072	7		_a1KLCM _2bisac
072	7		_aPOL000000 _2bisac
072	7		_aSOC053000 _2bisac
072	7		_aPOL010000 _2bisac
072	7		_aPOL011000 _2bisac
072	7		_a327.73072 _2bisac
100	1		_aArturo Santa-Cruz
245	1	0	_aMexico-United States Relations _bThe Semantics of Sovereignty
250			_a1
260			_aOxford _bRoutledge _c20141110
300			_a236 p
520			_bSovereignty is a key factor to consider when studying the Mexico-United States relationship. During most of the twentieth century, as a result of the new character of the Mexican post-revolutionary regime, there was a decoupling between the state’s maximalist discourse on sovereignty, and its practice. Sovereignty as an undifferentiated whole does not exist; it should instead be disaggregated into the myriad issue areas in which it is constantly negotiated. Focusing on a tripartite classification relating to the construction of Mexico’s sovereignty towards its northern neighbor since 1920, this volume illustrates how Mexico’s sovereignty has varied not only according to the times, but also according to the issues at stake. In doing so, Arturo Santa-Cruz comprehensively covers a variety of issues in the bilateral agenda such as drug trafficking, electoral observation, human rights, investment, migration, security, and trade, as well as some defining moments in the relationship, such as the 1923 US granting of recognition to the Mexican post-revolutionary regime, the 1938 oil nationalization, the 1982 debt crisis, and the 1995 financial bailout. These diverse cases, analyzed through an original analytical approach, capture sovereignty’s multifocal meaning.
999			_c1932 _d1932