Orphée et l'Orphisme dans l'Antiquité gréco-romaine (Record no. 8616)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02710 a2200289 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field 1040238335
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20250328151427.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 250324042024GB eng
020 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD BOOK NUMBER
International Standard Book Number 9781040238332
Qualifying information EA
037 ## - SOURCE OF ACQUISITION
Source of stock number/acquisition Taylor & Francis
Terms of availability GBP 52.99
Form of issue BB
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Original cataloging agency 01
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE
Language code of text/sound track or separate title eng
072 7# - SUBJECT CATEGORY CODE
Subject category code QRAX
Source thema
072 7# - SUBJECT CATEGORY CODE
Subject category code QDHA
Source thema
072 7# - SUBJECT CATEGORY CODE
Subject category code NHC
Source thema
072 7# - SUBJECT CATEGORY CODE
Subject category code HRAX
Source bic
072 7# - SUBJECT CATEGORY CODE
Subject category code HPCA
Source bic
072 7# - SUBJECT CATEGORY CODE
Subject category code HBLA1
Source bic
072 7# - SUBJECT CATEGORY CODE
Subject category code HIS000000
Source bisac
072 7# - SUBJECT CATEGORY CODE
Subject category code 292.9
Source bisac
100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Luc Brisson
245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Orphée et l'Orphisme dans l'Antiquité gréco-romaine
250 ## - EDITION STATEMENT
Edition statement 1
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Place of publication, distribution, etc. Oxford
Name of publisher, distributor, etc. Routledge
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 20241211
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent 313 p
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Expansion of summary note The figure of Orpheus has long exercised a potent influence on religious thought. Yet what we know directly about Orphism comes from a scatter of isolated and often very short fragments quoted in the works of Platonists of the Roman period, notably Proclus, Damascius and Olympiodorus. The author’s concern here is to establish the context in which these passages were cited, and to trace the development of the written tradition, from the texts which contain a critique of the beliefs of the Homeric era to those, whether newly composed or transformed, which show signs of adaptation to later religious and philosophical movements, among them Stoicism and Platonism. In sharp contrast to views held by others, it is argued that it is possible to map out a process of evolution, amongst other criteria by focusing on the role and place of Chronos in the Orphic theogony. The author also asks whether there really ever existed true Orphic sects with a cult with specific rites, and would conclude that the present evidence cannot be held to substantiate this. Orphée a pendant longtemps exercé une puissante influence sur la pensée religieuse. Cependant, ce que nous connaissons directement de l’Orphïsme se réduit à une poignée de fragments isolés et souvent très courts qui se trouvent éparpillés dans les oeuvres de Platoniciens ayant vécu sous l'Empire romain, surtout Proclus, Damascius et Olympiodore. Dans les articles qui composent ce recueil, l'auteur s'est attaché à reconstituer les contextes dans lesquels ces passages sont cités, et à comprendre comment s'est développée la tradition écrite à laquelle ils appartiennent, depuis les textes qui critiquent les croyances véhiculées par Homère et par Hésiode et qui, ayant fait l'objet d'une rédaction ou d'une transformation récente, présentent les signes d'une adaptation à des mouvements religieux ou philosophiques tardifs, le Stoïcisme et le médio-Platonisme entre autres. S'opposant en cela à b

No items available.